本平台为互联网非涉密平台,严禁处理、传输国家秘密、工作秘密或敏感信息

基于GC-IMS结合电子舌表征不同干燥方式白洋葱品质及挥发性风味
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.山东省农业科学院;2.山东百佳食品有限公司

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Characterization of Quality and Volatile Flavor of White Onions with Different Drying Processes Using GC-IMS Combined with Electronic Tongue
Author:
Affiliation:

Institute of Agro-Products processing Science and Technology

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为探究不同干燥方式对洋葱品质及风味的影响,采用4 种干燥方式,即热泵55 ℃-热风60 ℃、热泵60 ℃-热风60 ℃、热泵60℃、冻干,比较其干燥特性、理化品质及挥发性风味成分。结果表明:热泵60 ℃-热风60 ℃组合工艺较单一热泵干燥时长缩短25%;冻干洋葱色泽最优,总酚、总黄酮保留率最高,热泵60 ℃-热风60 ℃样品综合品质次之;干燥后洋葱鲜味、咸味、酸味显著上升,涩味降低,热泵 60 ℃-热风60 ℃组风味更为柔和;气相色谱-离子迁移谱(GC-IMS)共检出10类128种挥发性物质,脱水洋葱风味物质总量为鲜样的2~3倍,其中真空冷冻干燥样品含量达97.45 μg·g-1,含硫化合物占比最高,其余三组样品则以醇、醛、酮类物质为主,二丙烯基二硫醚等二硫醚类物质是洋葱核心风味组分;主成分分析(PCA)显示鲜样、冻干样与其余干燥样品风味差异显著,两种热泵-热风组合工艺样品风味特征相近。综合效率、品质与风味,HPD60 ℃-HAD60 ℃联合干燥具备较好的工业化应用潜力。本研究结合GC?IMS联合电子舌、气味活度值与PCA可有效区分不同干燥洋葱的风味差异,为脱水洋葱品质评价与风味调控提供理论基础。

    Abstract:

    Four drying methods were used to dehydrate white onions to explore the effects of different drying processes on their quality and flavor, including heat pump 55? °C - hot air 60?°C (HPD55? °C?HAD60 ℃), heat pump 60? °C- hot air 60 ?°C (HPD60?°C?HAD60℃), heat pump 60 ?°C (HPD), and vacuum freeze drying (FD). The drying characteristics, physicochemical traits and volatile aroma components were systematically investigated. It was demonstrated that drying time was reduced by 25% for HPD60 ℃-HAD60 ℃ in comparison with HPD. FD onions presented the optimal color as well as the maximum retention of total phenols and total flavonoids, while HPD60 ℃-HAD60 ℃ samples ranked next to FD in comprehensive quality. Drying remarkably increased umami, saltiness and sourness and decreased astringency of the samples according to electronic tongue analysis; Onions processed by HPD60 ?°C?HAD60 ?°C presented a milder overall flavor. 128 volatile flavor compounds were identified via gas chromatography?ion mobility spectrometry (GC?IMS), classified into 10 categories. The content of volatile substances in dehydrated onions was approximately 2~3 times that in fresh onions. Among them, FD?dried onions had the highest content (97.45?μg·g-1) and the highest level of sulfur?containing compounds, whereas the other three dehydrated onion samples were rich in alcohols, aldehydes, and ketones. Diallyl disulfide, (Z)?1?propenyl propyl disulfide, and isopropyl disulfide were the major flavor?contributing compounds of onions via odor activity value (OAV) analysis. Principal component analysis (PCA) demonstrated significant flavor differences between fresh onions and FD?dried onions, as well as between FD?dried onions and the other three dried onion samples. While the similar flavor profiles were observed between HPD60 ℃?HAD60 ℃ and HPD55 ?℃?HAD60 ℃ onions. Considering comprehensive efficiency, product quality and flavor characteristics, the combined drying process of HPD at 60 ℃ coupled with HAD at 60 ℃ exhibits promising potential for industrialized application. Combined with electronic tongue, OAV and PCA analyses, GC?IMS was proven to effectively distinguish flavor differences accross the samples subjected to four drying processes. These findings provide a theoretical basis for quality evaluation and flavor regulation of dehydrated onions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-06-17
  • 最后修改日期:2026-07-27
  • 录用日期:2026-07-28
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-10-12
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码